Fresh indications emerged on Sunday that
the Senate may dump the ‘Frivolous Petitions and other Matters
Connected therewith Bill’ otherwise known as the ‘anti-social media
bill’, on resumption from its current recess, tomorrow (Tuesday).
Investigations by our correspondent
revealed that the leadership of the federal parliament, obviously
uncomfortable with the barrage of criticisms that greeted the
introduction of the bill, had started planning a way to carefully drop
it.
Some lawmakers, who spoke with our
correspondent on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive
nature of the bill, explained that the mood in the red chamber at the
moment was for the bill to be rested.
A senator from the South-West
geopolitical zone said, “The initial plan was to allow the bill pass
through public hearing so that the Senate would drop it based on the
anticipated public opinion that would definitely be against the bill.
“However, another school of thought
within the committee is arguing that allowing the bill to go through
public hearing apart from being a waste of tax payers’ money, will
further expose the senators to ridicule as media reports from the event
will not be favourable.”
A cross-section of the senators agreed
that there were laws already in place that could address virtually all
the provisions of the proposed ‘anti-social media bill.’
One of them, said, “Majority of
Nigerians believe that the traditional media, obviously because of their
ownership structure, may not adequately air the views of the people as
they would want it hence they are looking at the Senate bill as a means
to gag their freedom of expression.”
A principal officer of the Senate, in an
interview with our correspondent, said the bill was not aimed at
gagging the media but a means to ensure that normal procedures were
followed in publishing allegations against any individual or group of
persons.
He also insisted that the bill would
undergo the normal legislative process and that Nigerians would have
the opportunity of the public hearing to express their views either for
or against the proposed law.
No comments:
Post a Comment